Still the same superciliousness, " .... -It had to have the potential to bring in billions of dollars in revenue". I thought the Dot B0mb days were long over. Why does a product have to make billions to be considered a "success". Micr0Sh@ft has spent billions in coming up with a good OS, but Linux still beats it hands-down (an OS developed by the community, for the community with no profit motive).
Linux maybe a commercial failure, but that doesn't mean it's not a technological success! These folks need to change their "criteria".
About Technology
Read the Article at HuffingtonPost
No comments:
Post a Comment